Not that long ago I decided that I would explore the world of audiobooks.
Some of my friends use audiobooks.
I spend a reasonable part of each week driving. I thought having something playing in the background would allow me to make best use of that time.
To me the obvious place to start was an audiobook download from Amazon.
After a while I had listened to the book and I thought that my niece might like to listen to it after me.
I own the book and I reasoned that this should present no problem.
I determined that there was no way to export the book from the playing interface. I couldn’t record it or indeed to pass it on by a method such as via email or file sharing service.
I contacted Amazon support and they told me it is forbidden to do what I was proposing.
Amazon control what you do with your audiobook.
When I owned a CD I could package up the CD and send it on to someone else. The CD belonged to me.
When I owned a book, I could take it to a charity shop and they could sell it; that was my right because the book belonged to me.
I discovered that in the world of downloads you do not own the item that you have bought. The closest relationship I can equate it to is a rental agreement in which you make a one-off payment.
This seems a shift in the power of ownership which few people seem aware of.
So far I have not met anyone who is trying to fight it.
I have decided that I will continue to buy physical media such as CDs because, at present, they belong to me.
What I want to do is to rip the CD to digital audio such as MP3. This convoluted approach is inefficient but at least I own the audiobook.
This means that I am not downloading audiobooks.
Recently I have discovered that there are some services where you do not pay for the audiobooks. Such as this one:
For those who love eBooks there are also free download services for these such as:
If large companies constrain how you use something you own there are ways to fight this.
One approach is to gain access to digital media for free.
Any stance which resists this trend seems to me appropriate.
If, for example, you decide to keep purchasing physical items companies would adapt to maintain their profits.
The alternative is to resign yourself to a future where your behaviour is controlled.